We may earn a commission when you buy through our links. Rankings are formula-based and never paid for. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Disclosure

Liebherr Wgb7470 vs Liebherr W5250

Two of the wine and beverage coolers in our best wine and beverage coolers comparison, lined up spec by spec. Every figure comes from the manufacturer pages linked below, and the scores use the same published formula as the full ranking.

Affiliate disclosure: We earn a commission if you buy through links on this page, at no extra cost to you. It never affects our rankings, which come from the published scoring formula. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more.

#1 of 32 in Wine and Beverage Coolers

Liebherr Wgb7470

7.7/10

Best for: Official 58% less energy than the U.S. federal standard, 19.7 cu ft total volume, 130 kWh/year

Check price at Amazon
#2 of 32 in Wine and Beverage Coolers

Liebherr W5250

7.2/10

Best for: Official 56% less energy than the U.S. federal standard, 13.1 cu ft total volume, 114 kWh/year

Check price at Amazon

Spec-by-spec comparison

Green marks the better published figure. "Not listed" means the manufacturer doesn't publish it.

SpecLiebherr Wgb7470Liebherr W5250Weight
Percent less energy than U.S. federal standardOfficial ENERGY STAR figure for how much less annual energy the model uses than the U.S. federal standard for its product class. Higher is better. A few official records list a negative figure; we still use that official number. Missing values take the category minimum. 58 % 56 % 40%
Certified total volumeOfficial ENERGY STAR certified total volume in cubic feet. ENERGY STAR does not publish a bottle count in the fields we used. Missing values take the category minimum. 19.7 cu ft 13.1 cu ft 32%
Annual energy useOfficial ENERGY STAR annual energy use in kilowatt-hours per year. Lower is better. Missing values take the category minimum (the highest energy use in the set). 130 kWh/year 114 kWh/year 28%
Percent less energy use than U.S. federal standard (ENERGY STAR)58%56%info
Annual energy use (ENERGY STAR)130 kWh/year114 kWh/yearinfo
Certified total volume (ENERGY STAR)19.7 cu ft13.1 cu ftinfo
Annual energy use per cubic foot (computed)6.6 kWh/year per cubic foot, computed as certified annual energy use ÷ certified total volume8.7 kWh/year per cubic foot, computed as certified annual energy use ÷ certified total volumeinfo
U.S. federal standard energy use (ENERGY STAR)311 kWh/year259 kWh/yearinfo
Adjusted volume (ENERGY STAR)19.7 cu ft13.1 cu ftinfo
Type (ENERGY STAR)CoolerCoolerinfo
Product class (ENERGY STAR)4 - Freestanding Cooler4 - Freestanding Coolerinfo
Built-in (ENERGY STAR)NoNoinfo
Defrost type (ENERGY STAR)Not listedNot listedinfo
Connected functionality (ENERGY STAR)NoNoinfo
Dimensions (ENERGY STAR)79 × 27 in (H × W)73 × 24 in (H × W)info
Refrigerant (ENERGY STAR)R-600aR-600ainfo
Meets ENERGY STAR Most Efficient 2025 criteriaNoNoinfo
Certified model numberWgb7470W5250info
Official brand name on the ENERGY STAR recordLiebherrLiebherrinfo
Related official records with the same certified ratingsNot listedSame official certified ratings also appear on Liebherr W5270. We keep one product page for this rating set so color, finish or brand rebadges are not given separate nearly identical pages.info
CrispPick score7.7/107.2/10100%

Where each one comes out ahead

Liebherr Wgb7470

Better published figure on: Percent less energy than U.S. federal standard, Certified total volume.

What we like

  • Highest official percent less energy than the U.S. federal standard in this comparison (58%)
  • Largest official certified total volume in this comparison (19.7 cu ft)

Watch out for

  • No additional scored gaps in the official record we used

Liebherr W5250

Better published figure on: Annual energy use.

What we like

  • Official 56% less energy than the U.S. federal standard
  • Large official certified total volume (13.1 cu ft)

Watch out for

  • No additional scored gaps in the official record we used

Verdict

On published specs, the Liebherr Wgb7470 scores higher (7.7 vs 7.2). Specs don't capture sound character or feel, so weigh the pros and cons above too.

  • Choose the Liebherr Wgb7470 if this sounds like you: official 58% less energy than the U.S. federal standard, 19.7 cu ft total volume, 130 kWh/year.
  • Choose the Liebherr W5250 if this sounds like you: official 56% less energy than the U.S. federal standard, 13.1 cu ft total volume, 114 kWh/year.
Liebherr Wgb7470 on AmazonLiebherr W5250 on Amazon
Spec sources

Related comparisons